Community College Research Center Reports on Labor Market Value of Stackable Credentials

January 24, 2018

Share this

Title: Stackable Credentials: Do They Have Labor Market Value?

Author: Thomas Bailey & Clive R. Belfield (For the Community College Research Center)

Date: November 2017

In a recent report released by the Community College Research Center, researchers Thomas Bailey and Clive Belfield examined whether or not there is evidence of the labor market value of stacking credentials.

These credentials are intended to take less time than an associate degree but are “stackable”— credentials that can be earned over time. They have grown in popularity because they take less time, require less money, and provide more flexible learning options for students.

Stacks can be progressive (students start with a certificate that leads to a subsequent associate or bachelor’s degree), supplemental (certificates are earned after a degree), or independent (multiple certificates can be earned but without a degree).

In their analysis of students who had earned one of these three types of credential stacks versus those who did not, the researchers used the 1997 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002, and data from North Carolina Community Colleges that included students who entered between 2002 and 2007. They did not find that earning any one of these stacks resulted in significant labor market returns as indicated by annual salary differentiation.

The researchers explain that while there were robust findings for degree holders and also positive gains for certificates (even though these are not very large), they found no concrete evidence of earning gains as a result of stacking these credentials. The labor market evidence was modestly positive for workers who had stacked credentials, but not significantly so.

The researchers acknowledged the small sample size of students in their databases who had stacked credentials and indicated that better, more deliberate surveys of this population may yield different results.

For more information, read the full report.

If you have any questions or comments about this blog post, please contact us.

Keep Reading

Discovering Hidden Barriers to Community College Enrollment and Success

When students apply to a community college, they expect enrollment to be a clear, orderly process. Unfortunately, for far too many students, it feels more like a maze, full of unknown steps, unfamiliar terminology and unexpected delays.
David Bevevino of the Education Advisory Board looks at how community college student onboarding is like a game of Chutes and Ladders—and what institutions can do to change it.

October 24, 2016

Erasing the Community College Stigma

ACE’s Jon Turk argues that community colleges are the solution to many of the challenges we face around higher education affordability, access, and success. But how do we convince students and families of their value?

June 26, 2019

Reducing Barriers to Transfer for Community College Students

While access to a high-quality and affordable college education is essential, access means little if students are unable to meet their educational goals once they arrive, writes Jon Turk. A new brief from ACE and Hobsons explores upward transfer—the movement from a community college to a four-year institution—for students who matriculate soon after high school.

May 1, 2017